July 4, 2007
Residents coming out in favour of clean-air technology at Nanticoke
Symposium survey results highlight support for emission-control
investment at coal plant
Jarvis – Results from a survey
handed out to close to 150 attendees at the recent Jarvis Energy and the
Environment Symposium spelled out overwhelming support for investment
in clean-air technology and carbon capture at OPG Nanticoke.
88 per cent of respondents to the survey
answered “yes” to the question, “Do you feel the Ontario
Government should invest in clean-air technology and carbon capture at
OPG Nanticoke?”
Further, when asked “which of the
following options should your local MPP pursue for Nanticoke?”,
over two-thirds of respondents chose, “continue operating OPG Nanticoke
while making further investments in clean-air technology and carbon capture.”
The next most popular answer indicated 13.6 per cent of respondents favoured,
“phase-out large-scale energy production at Nanticoke – along
with the corresponding jobs – and pursue alternatives such as wind,
solar, conservation and efficiency measures.”
Only 2.3 per cent of respondents favoured,
“Close OPG Nanticoke and pursue the construction of a nuclear power
plant.”
“My record is clear - I have long
advocated for investment in clean-air technology at OPG Nanticoke to build
on the emission reduction the previous government initiated with $250
million for Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) Units at both Nanticoke
and Lambton,” Barrett pointed out. “The concerned citizens
of our area who took time to provide input at the June 19th Jarvis Energy
Symposium have clearly advocated government to clean-up coal-fire emissions
while both protecting OPG Nanticoke’s 600 jobs and ensuring a reliable
and affordable form of energy for Ontario.
Meantime, results from Barrett’s
ongoing “Nukes at Nanticoke” survey made available at local
fairs and through MPP mailouts - to every home in the riding of Haldimand-Norfolk-Brant
– indicate 80.4 per cent of respondents chose “No” to
the question, “Are you in favour of nukes at Nanticoke? Yes or no?”
– while 19 per cent chose “Yes”.
“Local residents are clearly engaged
in the area energy debate and I encourage all those who have yet to have
their say to contact my office as we continue to look for direction from
those our future energy and environment decisions will impact directly,”
asserted Barrett. “My position is well-known – if Premier
McGuinty wishes to consider future energy construction at Nanticoke, he
must first make the case to area residents.”
Barrett further noted that he is continuing
to await direct answers from the Premier with regard to two separate “open
letters to the editor” that requested a breakdown of the facts regarding
government’s position on nuclear at Nanticoke on two fronts:
|
a cost-benefit analysis. |
|
a risk-benefit analysis. |
“There’s
so much at stake with regard to meeting future energy needs – the
environment, our economy, jobs – it’s vital that we learn
from all sides to make informed decisions for the future,” Barrett
concluded. “Let’s get it right…..”
Those interested in further information
from the speakers who presented in Jarvis can access websites at the following
addresses:
|
www.energyquest4nanticoke.ca |
|
www.caealliance.com |
|
www.cnwc-cctn.ca |
|
www.abetterenergyplan.ca |
|
www.thesociety.ca |
|
www.ofa.on.ca |
|
www.greenpeace.org/canada/ |
|
www.opg.com |
|
www.cfre.ca |
|
www.tobybarrett.com |
-30-
For more information, please contact:
Wendy MacMillan
Caledonia Lawn Bowling Club
(905) 765-9388
|