For
immediate release:
November 30, 2004
Coal
fire closure commitment up in the air?
MPP’s Barrett and O’Toole continue to press government on
energy front
Queen’s Park
– Haldimand-Norfolk-Brant MPP Toby Barrett is anticipating at least
one more broken promise following reports that the government is planning
to leave the door open to the possibility of coal-fired energy in the
future.
While the Ontario
Liberals promised shut down Ontario’s coal fire plants – including
the local Nanticoke facility and the 600 jobs it provides – by 2007,
Barrett has long argued that the commitment is ‘hare-brained’.
His reasons focus on the long-term availability of coal vs. natural gas,
Ontario’s dependence on fossil fuel for over 25 per cent of energy
supply, and the availability of clean-coal technology.
Today’s Windsor
Star indicates that Energy Minister Dwight Duncan may have been listening.
According to the Windsor
Star, “…the minister acknowledged that the giant coal stations
can’t fall into disrepair because they are needed to keep the lights
on.”
The Windsor Star quotes
the Minister as stating that the plants, “will be closed, yes. But
we may have something in backup for an emergency.”
The report goes on
to indicate that, “his department is still investigating the future
of ‘clean coal’ technology.”
Just last week, MPP
Barrett was on the Finance Committee debating Bill 100 – which includes
direction for the shut-down of coal-fire electricity – asking that
the government consider just such innovative clean-coal technology.
“Both George
W. Bush and John Kerry included clean-coal technology as a plank in their
energy platforms – Bush calling for a$2 billion in vestment and
Kerry planning for a $10 billion expenditure into the research and implementation
of clean-coal technology,” Barrett reported to the Finance Committee.
“With those kind of numbers being thrown around, it begs the question
– what do they know that this government doesn’t?”
Barrett also warned
the Finance Committee about the dangers of closing down a reliable and
sustainable source of energy with only a two-year window to replace it.
“There is an
overwhelming amount of proof to show that closing down coal energy will
not ensure the ‘adequacy, safety, sustainability and reliability
of electricity supply’ as called for in the direction of Bill 100,”
Barrett stated. “Ontario’s coal-fuelled plants supply more
than a quarter of our electricity – so if the members opposite carry
through with their wrong-headed coal closure plans by 2007, we have only
two years to replace 25 per cent of our energy supply.”
When questioned in
the Legislature on his coal-fired flip flop by Durham MPP and Opposition
Energy Critic John O’Toole, the Minister would neither confirm nor
deny except to say that, “government is committed to improving the
quality of air in this province by reducing and eliminating the emissions
associated with coal.”
|