What are your thoughts on nukes at Nanticoke?
In recent months,
there has been speculation regarding the future of energy production at
Nanticoke, including reports about the possibility of a nuclear power
facility – reports that have led to many questions requiring answers
for those of us living in the area.
Since this issue was first raised in
August 2005 - through comments made to Haldimand’s Mayor Marie Trainer
by Minister of Energy Dwight Duncan - I have worked to ensure people of
local communities surrounding OPG Nanticoke have answers and input.
After this issue was first raised, I
distributed a survey in my annual newsletter and at local fairs, giving
residents the opportunity to weigh in on the issue. While unscientific,
the results did not indicate strong support for new nuclear construction
at Nanticoke.
Premier McGuinty’s commitment of
$40 billion for new nuclear in Ontario and a Haldimand County Council
resolution supporting the establishment of a Nanticoke nuclear facility
underline the need for timely answers.
To that end, I have requested, through
an open letter to Dalton McGuinty, a thorough analysis of nuclear power
and what it would mean for people locally – and indeed for people
right across this province. I have asked that this analysis compare new
nuclear at Nanticoke vs. continued coal power with investments into clean
coal and carbon capture, focussing on two fronts:
A cost benefit analysis
A risk benefit analysis
Further, as any decision of this magnitude
requires all cards on the table, and given the precedent set last summer
in bypassing the environmental consultation process on a McGuinty Government
plan requiring new nuclear, I have also called for Ontario Government-led
public hearings for our area on the future direction of Nanticoke OPG.
The bottom line is area residents must
be provided with reliable information, and the Ontario Government must
hold public information sessions and consultations for public input prior
to any movement in this regard.
What are your thoughts on nuclear at
Nanticoke – give me a call (1-800-903-8629) or e-mail at toby@tobybarrett.com.
In June 2006, the Premier promised to
have an ‘open and public’ debate on nuclear power. But, on
Thursday June 22, 2006, the Premier said he would not subject his energy
plan to an Environmental Assessment, saying “If we were to go that
route, we would never be able to move forward on a plan that will meet
our long-term energy needs.”
My position is clear – if Premier
McGuinty wishes to consider nuclear construction at Nanticoke, he must
first make the case to area residents. He must demonstrate that his plan
would be safe, and would be better for the environment than investing
in clean-air/carbon capture technology at the existing coal-fired facility
– he must prove that his plan would be economically superior to
investing in alternatives.
Given the time for planning, investment,
and construction involved in any new nuclear process, nuclear, even if
initiated this year, would not be available before 2015. I continue to
stress the need for new investment into clear air technology to mitigate
emission concerns.
I encourage the Minister of Energy to
pay a visit to Nanticoke OPG to learn more about the facility and hear
from those impacted – an invitation I have made in the past to both
the current former Minister(s) of Energy.
|